Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEzaFjtrkkRKAHCa-H9qrBz+gatGAZL7skTTM3SP4webug@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:31 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:01 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
> It tracks things that happen in the general backends. Possibly we should also consider counting the errors actually found when running base backups? OTOH, that part of the code doesn't really track things like databases (as it operates just on the raw data directory underneath), so that implementation would definitely not be as clean...

Sorry I just realized that I totally forgot this part of the thread.

While it's true that we operate on raw directory, I see that sendDir()
already setup a isDbDir var, and if this is true lastDir should
contain the oid of the underlying database.  Wouldn't it be enough to
call sendFile() using this, something like (untested):

if (!sizeonly)
- sent = sendFile(pathbuf, pathbuf + basepathlen + 1, &statbuf, true);
+ sent = sendFile(pathbuf, pathbuf + basepathlen + 1, &statbuf, true,
isDbDir ? pg_atoi(lastDir+1, 4) : InvalidOid);

and accordingly report any checksum error from sendFile()?

That seems it was easy enough. PFA an updated patch that does this, and also rebased so it doesn't conflict on oid.

(yes, while moving this from draft to publish after lunch, I realized that you put a patch togerher for about the same. So let's merge it)

--
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Binary upgrade from <12 to 12 creates toast table forpartitioned tables
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?