On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Makes sense, will change and commit.
>
> Since the following hunk is repeated 3x, maybe it should be stuffed
> into a function that is then called in three places:
I considered it trivial enough not to do that for it. I can perhaps be
convinced otherwise, but I doubt it's worth it..
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/