Re: Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEypKsehnca5_ZY3oaRKVGnFAGUkZJZ059zmTnZae37N2g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi,

While working on
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEzwMa9y+Bp4Fi4fE4hmPfZMjOZOmuLVtbHhPWtcujrmLg@mail.gmail.com
I once more taken aback by the total lack of consistency between the
three files in $subject. Some of the inconsistency of guc.c vs. the rest
comes from having separate lists for different datatypes - hard to avoid
- but even disregarding that, there seems to be little to no
consistency.

How about we try to order them the same? That's obviously not a 9.6
topic at this point, but it'd probably be good to that early in 9.7.

Agreed, at least between the documentation and postgresql.conf.sample. That's also the order that users are likely to look at.

guc.c might be better to just stick to alphabetical per group. (Which we also don't do today, of course, but it could be a better way to do it there) 


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump / copy bugs with "big lines" ?