Re: Online checksums patch - once again

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEyTp8OKUxV+-id0PLoB0sA+7d2uefAzYnq=Kb03V5r5PQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Online checksums patch - once again  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Online checksums patch - once again  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:48 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2019-Aug-26, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> OK, let's try this again :)
>
> This is work mainly based in the first version of the online checksums
> patch, but based on top of Andres WIP patchset for global barriers (
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20181030051643.elbxjww5jjgnjaxg%40alap3.anarazel.de
> )
>
> Andres patch has been enhanced with wait events per
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEwy4LUFqePC5YzanwtzyDDpYvgrj6R5WNznwrO5ouVg1w%40mail.gmail.com
> .

Travis says your SGML doesn't compile (maybe you just forgot to "git
add" and edit allfiles.sgml?):

Nope, even easier -- the reference pgVerifyChecksums was renamed to pgChecksums and for some reason we missed that in the merge.

I've rebased again on top of todays master, but that was the only change I had to make.
 

Other than bots, this patch doesn't seem to have attracted any reviewers
this time around.  Perhaps you need to bribe someone?  (Maybe "how sad
your committer SSH key stopped working" would do?)

Hmm. I don't think that's a bribe, that's a threat. However, maybe it will work.
 
--
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables
Следующее
От: Amit Khandekar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys