Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEyAZ5ca677m9LfwjGkcZ_mhRdgJ4e_EyAp6T_ZDpQUCvA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Streaming basebackups vs pg_stat_tmp
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:57 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 10/28/16 3:49 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> The change from 10 to 11 increases the tests that are skipped on Windows,
> which is necessary because one extra symlink test is added.
>
> I think you need:
>
> [...]
>
> The rest of the tests are for exclusions.

Indeed, giving the attached for REL9_6_STABLE. You could as well have
a test for pg_stat_tmp but honestly that's not worth it. One thing I
have noticed is that the patch does not use _tarWriteDir() for
pg_xlog. I think it should even if that's not addressing directly a
bug...


Applied and backported, thanks. Backported to 9.4, as this is where that exclusion code appeared.

I did not backport the tests, as we don't have the $node stuff available in 9.5 and earlier.

--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: add more NLS to bin
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Let's get rid of SPI_push/SPI_pop