Re: xlog location arithmetic
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: xlog location arithmetic |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEy3nqhMvyGQRbYYSdYjuB1B_Kgc_kxHBnZqdUMw+z6c1Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: xlog location arithmetic (Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: xlog location arithmetic
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 00:53, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
<euler@timbira.com> wrote:
> On 25-02-2012 09:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Do we even *need* the validate_xlog_location() function? If we just
>> remove those calls, won't we still catch all the incorrectly formatted
>> ones in the errors of the sscanf() calls? Or am I too deep into
>> weekend-mode and missing something obvious?
>>
> sscanf() is too fragile for input sanity check. Try
> pg_xlog_location_diff('12/3', '-10/0'), for example. I won't object removing
> that function if you protect xlog location input from silly users.
Ah, good point. No, that's the reason I was missing :-)
Patch applied, thanks!
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: