Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEy3e_ncM+f3=i6T1qvwHkH1c3f2MmJd1ZS=Aq+OfBKS5Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output  (Alvaro Hernandez <aht@ongres.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output  (Alvaro Hernandez <aht@ongres.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Alvaro Hernandez <aht@ongres.com> wrote:


On 25/09/17 20:18, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2017-09-24 13:36:56 +0300, Alvaro Hernandez wrote:
     However, if DMS uses it for what I'd call production use, I assume it is
actually production quality. I bet they do enough testing, and don't ship
software to potentially millions of customers if it doesn't work well. So...
first, I'd consider this a a sign of robustness.
You've been in software for how long? ... ;)  There's quite mixed
experiences with DMS.

     Actually long enough to understand that if someone "big" calls it production quality, we should not be pickier and assume it is --whether it is or not. People will accept it as such, and that's good enough.

Historically the fact that we have been pickier than many of the "someone big":s is exactly how we ended up with the codebase and relative stability we have today.

Just because someone is big doesn't mean they know what's right. In fact, more often than not the opposite turns out to be true.

--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Satyanarayana Narlapuram
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Reading backup label file for checkpoint and redolocation during crash recovery
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47language tags. Should it?