<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Oct 19, 2014 4:34 AM, "Robert Haas" <<a
href="mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > > But TBH I
suspect95% of the problems here would vanish if smart<br /> > > shutdown weren't the default ...<br /> ><br />
>But for your repeated objections, we would have changed the default to fast years ago. AFAICT everyone else is in
favorof that.<br /> ><p dir="ltr">Yes, most others even seemed more than happy to change the behaviour of smart to
bethat of fast, and rename the old "smart" method to "silly". <p dir="ltr">no, that's not something I'd recommend, for
compatibilityreasons, but definitely +<all current quota> to not have the silly be the default.. <p
dir="ltr">/Magnus