Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I said before and I'll say again that I don't like the idea of
> multiple password verifiers.  I think that's an accident waiting to
> happen, and I'm not prepared to put in the amount of time and energy
> that it would take to get that feature committed despite not wanting
> it myself, or for being responsible for it afterwards.  I'd prefer we
> didn't do it at all, although I'm not going to dig in my heels.  I
> might be willing to deal with SCRAM itself, but this whole area is not
> my strongest suit.  So ideally some other committer would be willing
> to pick this up.

I won't bet my hand on that.

I have marked the patch as returned with feedback.