Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup
Дата
Msg-id CABUevExExTREsuc-j5ZLO-GbtS-k7_FnBROULdD-j=YDPww33g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 20:12, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Attached patch implements a "low watermark wal location" in the
>> walsender shmem array. Setting this value in a walsender prevents
>> transaction log removal prior to this point - similar to how
>> wal_keep_segments work, except with an absolute number rather than
>> relative.
>
> cool! just a question, shouldn't we clean the value after the base
> backup has finished?

We should. Thanks, will fix!

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing