Re: Useless dependency assumption libxml2 -> libxslt in MSVC scripts

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Useless dependency assumption libxml2 -> libxslt in MSVC scripts
Дата
Msg-id CABUevExCc9Hrcep+ssvDwXBxXB1PDRjs6U2dYjk+vvVCOxxuFA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Useless dependency assumption libxml2 -> libxslt in MSVC scripts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Useless dependency assumption libxml2 -> libxslt in MSVC scripts  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> But I don't understand the reason behind such a restriction to be
> honest because libxml2 does not depend on libxslt. The contrary is
> true: libxslt needs libxml2.

Right.

Pretty sure this goes back to *our* XML support requiring both. As in you couldn't turn on/off xslt independently, so the "xml requires xslt" comment is that *our* xml support required both.

This may definitely not be true anymore, and that check has just not been updated.

Also this was 10 years ago, so I'm of course not 100% sure, but I think it was something like that...

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Useless dependency assumption libxml2 -> libxslt in MSVC scripts