Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEx4_1j5eraBFX=6AgeCW4A4mawg6P4=JVcyH_9Fp4MF5Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: >> Windows does not have socketpair(), nor a strict pipe() equivalent. I expect >> switching to socketpair() makes the Windows side trickier in some ways and >> simpler in others. +1 for exploring that direction first. > > A bit of googling suggests that emulating socketpair() on Windows is not > that hard: basically you create an accepting socket and connect to it. > Ugly I guess but likely to be nicer than emulating the two-pipes trick > exactly. That sounds a lot like what we were doing in pgpipe() before.. It was removed in d2c1740dc275543a46721ed254ba3623f63d2204, but that's because it was dead at the time. Do we need to bring it back? -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: