Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Building server without Apache

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Building server without Apache
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEx3TRwEQCQbgOhEmP_1=tq+LfZGv7XBK3YhvjYmXNH1nQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Building server without Apache  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Список pgadmin-hackers


On Jan 12, 2017 4:56 AM, "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@berkus.org> wrote:
> Pgadmin gurus:
>
> I'm trying to create a canonical container image for pgAdmin4 Server.
> However, using Apache is kind of heavyweight for a container.  Has
> anyone run pgAdmin4 against something lighter weight?

If memory serves, the reason why we recommend Apache is that at the
time I last tested, it was the only one of Apache, Lighttpd and Nginx
which would support single-process, multi-thread WSGI apps.

Having a single process is essential, due to the global connection
manager used by pgAdmin - it's the only way we can guarantee affinity
between the user session and the database session. If you can make
that work with servers other than Apache (someone recently suggested
Gunicorn might be able to help), then I'd love to hear about it. There
are no other special requirements of pgAdmin, so really that's all
that stands in your way.


Uwsgi might also be worth investigating. It's pretty light and supports an hybrid model where ISTM it would work if you just set number of processes to 1 (but I haven't tried it with pgadmin specifically. 

/Magnus

В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fahar Abbas
Дата:
Сообщение: [pgadmin-hackers] Re: PATCH: RM# 1679 - Background process for "restore" not reportingstatus back to pgAdmin
Следующее
От: George Gelashvili
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Driver Module