Re: Mail thread references in commits

<p dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">On Nov 19, 2016 15:33, "Andrew Dunstan" <<a
href="mailto:andrew@dunslane.net">andrew@dunslane.net</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> ><br /> ><br /> > On
11/19/201607:36 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:<br /> >><br /> >> Magnus,<br /> >><br /> >> * Magnus
Hagander(<a href="mailto:magnus@hagander.net">magnus@hagander.net</a>) wrote:<br /> >>><br /> >>> On
Sat,Nov 19, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Stephen Frost <<a href="mailto:sfrost@snowman.net">sfrost@snowman.net</a>> wrote:<br
/>>>>><br /> >>>> * Magnus Hagander (<a
href="mailto:magnus@hagander.net">magnus@hagander.net</a>)wrote:<br /> >>>>><br /> >>>>>
Itwould make the URLs actually short, but as mentioned upthread, that<br /> >>>>> wouldn't work at all
ifoffline. So it'd be a tradeoff between those, but<br /> >>>>> so are pretty much all other options
thatdon't include the full<br /> >>>><br /> >>>> message-id.<br /> >>>><br />
>>>>This is a bit of a crazy idea, but in the new list system, couldn't we<br /> >>>> add a
headerwhich includes "our" surrogate message-id?  Or possibly the<br /> >>>> entire URL to the message, and
maybethe URL for the entire thread?<br /> >>><br /> >>> I'd rather not tie those systems in that
tightly.I think they are much<br /> >>> better off being de-coupled.<br /> >><br /> >> I get that,
but...<br/> >><br /> >>> That said, what we could do is invent our own "id". We could either use a<br />
>>>separate surrogate key, or we could do the sha-1 hash of the messageid. And<br /> >>> stick that
ina header, which could then be searched for both locally and<br /> >>> remotely.<br /> >><br />
>>Yeah, that's a good thought too.  I think we'd need to use a SHA1 to<br /> >> avoid collisions which
meansthat it'll be a bit longer than if we used<br /> >> an actual ID, but it shouldn't be *too* long.<br />
>><br/> ><br /> ><br /> > I can think of at least one scenario where you might not easily have access to
anyinvented ID - you're the author and you have mailing list me-too turned off, so you don't have anything that the
mailinglist has inserted. I honestly think we should just stick with the Message-ID value and get over the ugliness.<br
/>><br /> > Putting the clickable URL in a header("X-Archive-Link" ?) is a good idea, though. Using my MUA
(Thunderbird)that would make it as simple to get as View Source (Ctrl-U) and a simple C&P, which would make
committers'lives easy. I bet others might appreciate it too.<br /><p dir="ltr">As a thunderbird user you might be
interestedin something like <a
href="https://github.com/mhagander/pgarchives">https://github.com/mhagander/pgarchives</a>. I don't know if it works
withmodern versions of thunderbird, but hopefully it does. And would be more  convenient than the view source way.. <p
dir="ltr">/Magnus