On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 27 June 2012 18:24, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> will never become sync standby even
>> if their name is in synchronous_standby_names.
>
> I don't understand why you'd want that.
>
> What is wrong with removing the name from synchronous_standby_names if
> you don't like it?
I believe that's just fallout -the main point is that we don't want to
become a sync standby when synchronous_standby_names is set to '*'.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/