On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 08.08.2012 12:36, Jim Vanns wrote:
>>
>> Ah ha. Yes, you're correct. It does mention here that an Int16 is used
>> to specify the number of parameter format codes, values etc.
>>
>> I suggest then that the documentation is updated to reflect this? Anf
>> again, perhaps the 'int' for nParams should be an int16_t or short?
>
>
> I don't think we should change the function signature for this, but I think
> a sanity check for "nParams < 32768" in libpq would be in order.
+1 - and also a clear update to the documentation.
-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/