Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEwTc0uaRxEFr-LVDho9KUmWZMW_8hv=SghwJd9yUtPM0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 13:50, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> The pg_stat_replication view exposes all the fields in
>> StandbyReplyMessage *except* for the timestamp when the message was
>> generated. On an active system this is not all that interesting, but
>> on a mostly idle system that allows the monitoring to react faster
>> than the timeout that actually kicks the other end off - and could be
>> useful in manual debugging scenarios. Any particular reason why this
>> was not exposed as it's own column?
>
> I wondered the same thing.  Sounds like a good idea.

I can go do that. Care to argue^Wbikeshed for a specific name?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: some missing internationalization in pg_basebackup
Следующее
От: Anssi Kääriäinen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: index-only scans