On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 04:22, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> When walsender calls out to do_pg_stop_backup() (during base backups),
>> it is not possible to terminate the process with a SIGTERM - it
>> requires a SIGKILL. This can leave unkillable backends for example if
>> archive_mode is on and archive_command is failing (or not set). A
>> similar thing would happen in other cases if walsender calls out to
>> something that would block (do_pg_start_backup() for example), but the
>> stop one is easy to provoke.
>
> Good catch!
>
>> ISTM one way to fix it is the attached, which is to have walsender set
>> the "global" flags saying that we have received sigterm, which in turn
>> causes the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() calls in the routines to properly
>> exit the process. AFAICT it works fine. Any holes in this approach?
>
> Very simple patch. Looks fine.
Ok, thanks. Applied.
>> Second, I wonder if we should add a SIGINT handler as well, that would
>> make it possible to send a cancel signal. Given that the end result
>> would be the same (at least if we want to keep with the "walsender is
>> simple" path), I'm not sure it's necessary - but it would at least
>> help those doing pg_cancel_backend()... thoughts?
>
> I don't think that's necessary because, as you suggested, there is no
> use case for *now*. We can add that handler when someone proposes
> the feature which requires that.
Yeah. It's certainly not something backpatch-worthy.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/