Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEw-FxyE+ruXjrboLmc-guU_hCLiqehn=c1aPA6eF5+wag@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Ответы Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
On 8/26/16 4:08 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Splitting of ephemeral data seems to have a benefit, the rest seems more
like rather noisy busywork to me.

 People accidentally blowing away pg_clog or pg_xlog is a pretty common occurrence, and I don't think there's all that many tools that reference them. I think it's well worth renaming them.

Pretty sure every single backup tool or script out there is referencing pg_xlog. If it's not, then it's broken...

pg_clog is a different story of course.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_xlogdump fails to handle WAL file with multi-page XLP_FIRST_IS_CONTRECORD data
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing checks when malloc returns NULL...