Re: plpgsql.consistent_into

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marti Raudsepp
Тема Re: plpgsql.consistent_into
Дата
Msg-id CABRT9RBkT2kAYaw1bQV9bs0Eb5L7usfQKEd33T33trPEuLkXYA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plpgsql.consistent_into  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
> Do we actually support = right now? We already support
>
> v_field := field FROM table ... ;
>
> and I think it's a bad idea to have different meaning for = and :=.

That was already discussed before. Yes, we support both = and := and
they have exactly the same behavior; I agree, we should keep them
equivalent.

Regards,
Marti



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thom Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wal_buffers = -1
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance