Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavan Deolasee
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Дата
Msg-id CABOikdOOJ07E-Ne=DjS4mb902NFaDORHpFrwOby7Efc+Bi11rA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Hi Tom,

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

(I'm a little more concerned by Alvaro's apparent position that WARM
is a done deal; I didn't think so.  

Are there any specific aspects of the design that you're not comfortable with? I'm sure there could be some rough edges in the implementation that I'm hoping will get handled during the further review process. But if there are some obvious things I'm overlooking please let me know.

Probably the same question to Andres/Robert who has flagged concerns. On my side, I've run some very long tests with data validation and haven't found any new issues with the most recent patches.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
 Pavan Deolasee                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavan Deolasee
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?