Re: Q: regarding backends

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ian Lawrence Barwick
Тема Re: Q: regarding backends
Дата
Msg-id CAB8KJ=iebhM3n_OJzHV-V-OMFbCp8UM1OYm0UurzRPpgvbstrg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Q: regarding backends  (Stephan Fabel <sfabel@hawaii.edu>)
Список pgsql-general
2013/12/10 Stephan Fabel <sfabel@hawaii.edu>:
> Hi all,
>
> and sorry if I'm asking a question that has been answered before; has the
> PostgreSQL community ever considered different key/value backends (sort of like
> MySQL with its many different options)?
>
> We'd be very interested in seeing the effects of integrating LMDB [*] in terms
> of performance gains. Has this avenue been explored before?

There was talk of pluggable storage at this year's PGCon (PGUncon?):

  https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/2013UnconfPluggableStorage

but even if the idea gains traction, it's not going to arrive any time soon.

As Kevin mentions, FDWs might provide a good alternative. An example
with key/value stores I've been citing recently is this one:

  http://blog.cloudflare.com/kyoto_tycoon_with_postgresql


Regards

Ian Barwick


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: misspaola@tiscali.it
Дата:
Сообщение: DB Audit
Следующее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: add parameter to existing function