On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
>>> Alright, I've added logging for autovacuum in v23. I ended up needing to
>>> do a little restructuring to handle the case when the relation was skipped
>>> because the lock could not be obtained. While doing so, I became
>>> convinced that LOG was probably the right level for autovacuum logs.
>
>> OK, of course let's not change the existing log levels. This could be
>> always tuned later on depending on feedback from others. I can see
>> that guc.c also uses elevel == 0 for some logic, so we could rely on
>> that as you do.
>
> FWIW, I don't think this patch should be mucking with logging behavior
> at all; that's not within its headline charter, and I doubt many people
> are paying attention. I propose to commit it without that. If you feel
> hot about changing the logging behavior, you can resubmit that as a new
> patch in a new thread where it will get some visibility and debate on
> its own merits.
Okay. I am fine with that as well.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers