Re: TABLESAMPLE patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: TABLESAMPLE patch
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqTuDAEr00AbapauBB+Ta7UH3z7qfzhtM6z-14h3FgqqVw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: TABLESAMPLE patch  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: TABLESAMPLE patch  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Attached is v3 which besides the fixes mentioned above also includes changes
> discussed with Tomas (except the CREATE/DROP TABLESAMPLE METHOD), fixes for
> crash with FETCH FIRST and is rebased against current master.
This patch needs a rebase, there is a small conflict in parallel_schedule.

Structurally speaking, I think that the tsm methods should be added in
src/backend/utils and not src/backend/access which is more high-level
as tsm_bernoulli.c and tsm_system.c contain only a set of new
procedure functions. Having a single header file tsm.h would be also a
good thing.

Regarding the naming, is "tsm" (table sample method) really appealing?
Wouldn't it be better to use simply tablesample_* for the file names
and the method names?

This is a large patch... Wouldn't sampling.[c|h] extracted from
ANALYZE live better as a refactoring patch? This would limit a bit bug
occurrences on the main patch.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Kirkwood
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tracking commit timestamps