Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqTe=aWQTJHmYco0L3Gz8rjWosSVjRT4oGd_7DHTOP=xbg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function  ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Karl O. Pinc <kop@meme.com> wrote:
> Is this an argument for having the current_logfiles always exist
> and be empty when there is no in-filesystem logfile?  It always felt
> to me that the code would be simpler that way.

Well, you'll need to do something in any case if the logging_collector
is found disabled and the syslogger process is restarted. So just
removing it looked cleaner to me. I am not strongly attached to one
way of doing or the other though.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctlstart without --wait