Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqTdPX3A-k7AYSX4YTqONPe2Swi_gkOds-4U5hczdYRFsw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Ответы Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
If we stick with this version I'd argue it makes more sense to just stick the sync_node = and priority = statements into the if block and ditch the continue. </nitpick>
Let's go with the cleaner version then, I'd prefer code that can be read easily for this code path. Switching back is not much complicated either.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X