Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqTWY2TAa-aXxcjv3eTxCx6dVt43vBBtQXpi2vea94SYgg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h  (Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 6/27/17 01:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I have noticed $subject. A patch is attached. Those comments are not
>> completely wrong either as pg_basebackup can generate pg_xlog as well,
>> still I would recommend to just mention "pg_wal".
>
> committed

Thanks.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Small comment fix in partition.c