Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqTTh8j--+=8LocS6TJpbvTyCRSKOp=XkXGiAjHZpa34cw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:45 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> The one I run into frequently is in a proprietary fork, RDS Postgres.
> It'll happily dump out COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsq IS ...
> which is great as far as it goes, but errors out when you try to
> reload it.
>
> While bending over backwards to support proprietary forks strikes me
> as a terrible idea, I'd like to enable pg_dump to produce and consume
> ToCs just as pg_restore does with its -l/-L options.  This would
> provide the finest possible grain.

Let's add as well a similar switch to pg_dumpall that gets pushed down
to all the created pg_dump commands. If this patch gets integrated
as-is this is going to be asked. And tests would be welcome.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server