On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> - The GSSAPI authentication code has been moved without modification.
>>> In doing so, the temptation to modify it (flags, error checking, that
>>> big comment at the top about things from Athena, etc.) is very large.
>>> I do not know whether these changes are best suited to another patch
>>> in this series or should be reviewed separately. I am also hesitant
>>> to add things beyond the core before I am told this is the right
>>> approach.
>>
>> I would recommend a different patch if code needs to be moved around.
>> The move may make sense taken as an independent piece of the
>> integration.
>
> Sorry, are you suggesting separate patch for moving the GSS auth code,
> or separate patch for changes to said code? I am happy to move it if
> so, just want to be sure.
This is based on my first impressions on the patch. Let's discuss more
those points once I got a more in-depth look at the patch with what it
actually does. In short, there is no need to put more efforts in the
coding now :) Sorry to confuse you.
>> + * Portions Copyright (c) 2015-2016, Red Hat, Inc.
>> + * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2016, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
>> I think that this part may be a problem... Not sure the feeling of the
>> others regarding additional copyright notices.
>
> Good catch. That's an accident (force of habit). Since I'm pretty sure
> this version won't be merged anyway, I'll drop it from the next one.
>
>> It would be good to add that to the next CF, I will be happy to get a
>> look at it.
>
> Sounds good. Thanks for looking at it!
Okay, let's do this.
--
Michael