On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:11 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>> I would prefer not to bump it to the next CF unless we decide this will
>> not get fixed for 9.6.
>
> It may make sense to add that to the list of open items for 9.6
> instead. That's not a feature.
So I have moved this patch to the next CF for now, and will work on
fixing it rather soonishly as an effort to stabilize 9.6 as well as
back-branches.
--
Michael