Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqT2qRwnEZmxp0H3RVvwfAKvhQYZdfr-sj_gZfKGFwL1CQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have prepared separate patches for hash and btree index.  I think
> for another type of indexes, it is better to first fix the pd_lower
> issue.

Just wondering (sorry I have not looked at your patch in details)...
Have you tested the compressibility effects of this patch on FPWs with
and without wal_compression?
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Banck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requestedand not yet present
Следующее
От: Amit Khandekar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order