Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> It looks amazingly simple from here. Which probably means there's more to it
> that I haven't seen yet. I could use advice from someone who knows the
> locking subsystem better.

The status of this patch is I think not correct. It is marked as
waiting on author but Nikhil has showed up and has written an updated
patch. So I am moving it to next CF with "needs review".
-- 
Michael