Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqT+3iVJs=WB9y4d+R_O2rmRJTCmJxzxYK3bT+0oko0e4A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Well for indexes you don't really need to add the new AT command, as
> IndexStmt has char *idxcomment which it will automatically uses as comment
> if not NULL. While  I am not huge fan of the idxcomment it doesn't seem to
> be easy to remove it in the future and it's what transformTableLikeClause
> uses so it might be good to be consistent with that.

Oh, right, I completely missed your point and this field in IndexStmt.
Yes it is better to be consistent in this case and to use it. It makes
as well the code easier to follow.
Btw, regarding the new AT routines, I am getting find of them, it
makes easier to follow which command is added where in the command
queues.

Updated patch attached.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postgresql-9.5alpha1 packaging
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22