On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-05-15 09:11:15 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> When working on a decoder plugin, I have been pointed that it is
>> incorrect to write changes in an output plugin while not being in the
>> memory context where changes are written.
>
> That was a misunderstanding. It's perfectly alright to do so. The 'bug'
> you have is that you sometimes wrote empty messages. Which
> pg_recvlogical doesn't accept. There's little reason to allow doing so,
> but for consistency we could probably ok to allow it.
Yeah, thanks. Pushed a fix. Also I imagine that this is not really a
problem, but is there an impact on the plugin if
OutputPluginPrepareWrite is called and OutputPluginWrite is not for a
single change? By looking at the code I am guessing that we use
WalSndPrepareWrite for a plugin to prepare a message, and then
WalSndWriteData to finish the work, so we end up with an empty message
that is not sent to the backend. It doesn't matter much for
test_decoding as it always writes a change, but shouldn't we
discourage users to do so in the documentation? Something like a
big-fat warning mentioning that using OutputPluginPrepareWrite called
without OutputPluginWrite may result in stall messages stuck in the
queue?
--
Michael