Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> (instead of < in my previous suggestion, if some processors return 0 on
> -INT64_MIN). Also, a comment is needed to explain why such a bizarre
> condition is used/needed for just the INT64_MIN case.

The last patch I sent has this bit:
+              /*
+               * Some machines throw a floating-point exception
+               * for INT64_MIN % -1, the correct answer being
+               * zero in any case.
+               */
How would you reformulate that à-la-Fabien?
--
Michael