Re: WAL consistency check facility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: WAL consistency check facility
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqSvgt0WHLCUGxSsVeuPKAknkyY_Wd2PtSBLDAuBdwiKQw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not getting why we should introduce a new redo action and return
> from the function beforehand.

Per my last email, same conclusion from here :)
Sorry if I am picky and noisy on many points, I am trying to think
about the value of each change introduced in this patch, particularly
if they are meaningful, can be improved in some way, or can be
simplified and make the code more simple.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kuntal Ghosh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL consistency check facility
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL consistency check facility