On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 7 July 2015 at 21:37, Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, I obviously missed that pg_srand48() is only used if the system
>> lacks random/srandom, sorry for the noise. So yes, random() must be
>> used instead of pg_lrand48().
>>
>> I'm attaching a new version of the patch fixing this issue just in case.
>
> Thanks for picking this up. I've been trying to find time to come back
> to it but been swamped in priority work.
For now I am marking that as returned with feedback.
--
Michael