On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> (3)
> Should we change the default value of max_wal_size from 1 GB to a smaller size? I vote for "no" for performance.
The default has just changed in v10, so changing it again could be
confusing, so I agree with your position.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers