Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqSjb1-==LnkdtCwwNu7ucCDuSWJT87yKQWVH+6XWJ4Zvw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Craig Ringer
<craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> We need it for tap tests. More and more will use pg_basebackup and it'll
> start hurting test speeds badly.

Ah yes, that's a good argument. hamster would suffer pretty badly
after that if nothing is done. I'll get an extra patch out for that,
with --no-sync and not --nosync by the way.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Let file_fdw access COPY FROM PROGRAM
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)