Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqShY1tK_u0kfZ-yhsaUGVsG+mPp7dd-4jsN_NRS6myT0Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Ok.  I see that there is a new compelling reason to move the ring
> buffer to the sender side: then I think lag tracking will work
> automatically for the new logical replication that just landed on
> master.  I will try it that way.  Thanks for the feedback!

Seeing no new patches, marked as returned with feedback. Feel free of
course to refresh the CF entry once you have a new patch!
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Forbid use of LF and CR characters in database and role names