Re: [HACKERS] Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqSfjeNfTbhF_oQQq0xn3DZ18jy6OkFeJwjmX2nKSZv8Pw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I think that's right, although, I don't see any new RangeVar created under
> vacuum() at the moment.  Maybe, you're referring to the Nathan's patch
> that perhaps does that.

Yes, you can check what it does here (last version):
766556DD-AA3C-42F7-ACF4-5DC97F41F151@amazon.com
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations