Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqSaucq8mMsrEh7kn7Ha4q5XKvBzmb-+TLFqKNaOoAO77w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Finally, while I'm raining on everyone's parade: the mechanism of
> identifying synchronous replicas by setting the application_name on the
> replica is confusing and error-prone; if we're building out synchronous
> replication into a sophisticated system, we ought to think about
> replacing it.

I assume that you do not refer to a new parameter in the connection
string like node_name, no? Are you referring to an extension of
START_REPLICATION in the replication protocol to pass an ID?
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Sawada Masahiko
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql