Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqSS=z35w9BHbOKGszZYFkoUJWRAY_4ynbBWc=ud+Hrh3w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
>> Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Meh. I forgot docs and --help output updates.
>>
>> Looks good, except that you left the "N" option in the getopt_long
>> call for pg_dumpall.  I fixed that in the attached patch.
>
> No, v5 has removed it, but it does not matter much now...
>
>> I'll mark the patch "ready for committer".
>
> Thanks!

Moved to CF 2017-01.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)", File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200)
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL consistency check facility