Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqSPf0qkq=DhSO-tAM9++LSA2aEYSVJ3oY_EdUdb=jKi1w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I've not read through the thread, but this seems like the wrong approach
> to me. The receiving side should use a correct value, instead of putting
> this complexity on the sender's side.

Yes I agree with that. The current patch gives me a bad feeling to be
honest with the way it does things..
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Следующее
От: Christoph Berg
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] initdb failure on Debian sid/mips64el inEventTriggerEndCompleteQuery