On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Ali Akbar <the.apaan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Peter, while reviewing the better performing patch myself, now i think the
> patch needs more work to be committed. The structuring of the method will be
> confusing in the long term. I think I'll restructure the patch in the next
> commitfest.
> So i propose to break the patch:
> 1. We apply the current patch which uses xmlNodeCopy, so that the
> long-standing bug will be fixed in postgres.
> 2. I'll work with the performance enhancement in the next commitfest.
>
> Maybe for (2), the current better-performing patch can be viewed as PoC of
> the expected performance.
Ali, are you currently working on that? Would you mind re-creating new
entries in the commit fest app for the new set of patches that you are
planning to do?
For now I am switching this patch as returned with feedback.
Thanks,
--
Michael