Re: pg_archivecleanup not deleting anything?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pg_archivecleanup not deleting anything?
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqSEokk3KiRq+9x4=-1Zchv5tBk1umyTc7Azz=aMzu8iOg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_archivecleanup not deleting anything?  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Ответы Re: pg_archivecleanup not deleting anything?  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>> The docs mention that "all WAL files" preceding a given point are
>>>> removed, personally I understand that as "all 16MB-size segments shall
>>>> die", hence excluding backup and history files from the stack. But one
>>>> may understand that "WAL files" means everything in pg_xlog, so as
>>>> something that includes backup and history files. Perhaps we would
>>>> gain in clarity by saying "WAL file segments, including .partial
>>>> segments" in the docs, and not just "WAL files". Thoughts?
>>>
>>> It might help to add:
>>> "Timeline history files and backup history files are not deleted."
>>
>> Something among those lines?
>
>> +  <para>
>> +   WAL file segments and WAL file segments with <literal>.partial</literal>
>> +   are deleted, while timeline history files and backup history files are not.
>> +  </para>
>
> "WAL file segments with .partial" sounds strange.
> What about "WAL file segments (including partial ones) are deleted, while ..."?

Does that look better?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Deadlock detected after pg_repack receives SIGINT
Следующее
От: Jiří Hlinka
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Deadlock detected after pg_repack receives SIGINT