Re: WAL consistency check facility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: WAL consistency check facility
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqS-=0jh2+u7iV6TOmyt6E0V+PPVUj_rUcDCrM9CdUGo0g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thoughts?

There are still a couple of things that this patch makes me unhappy,
particularly the handling of the GUC with the xlogreader flags. I am
not sure if I'll be able to look at that again within the next couple
of weeks, but please be sure that this is registered in the next
commit fest. You could for example do that by changing the patch from
"Returned with Feedback" to "Moved to next CF" in the commit fest app.
Be sure as well to spend a couple of cycles in reviewing patches.
Usually for one patch sent, that's one patch of equal difficulty to
review, and there are many patch still waiting for feedback.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: patch: function xmltable
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Stopping logical replication protocol