Re: Missing checks on return value of timestamp2tm in datetime.c

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> timestamp2tm is called close to 40 times in the backend source code,
> returning -1 in case of failure. However, there are two places in datetime.c
> where we do not check for its return value: GetCurrentDateTime and
> GetCurrentTimeUsec.
> This does not really matter much in practice as the timestamp used is
> GetCurrentTransactionStartTimestamp(), but for correctness shouldn't we
> check for its return code and report ERRCODE_DATETIME_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE on
> error?
>
> Per se the patch attached.

And here is the patch.
(Thanks David R. for the poke).
--
Michael