Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRiMjN94vnhT07mGgeNE7K39nqMFUSHYOYpbnf_n4U-ug@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments withpg_receivexlog  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> Why not provide % replacements that contain that info? pg_receivexlog has a
> much better shot at doing that correctly than some random user tool...
>
> (%f could certainly be useful for other things)

(was unfortunately sent off-list, thanks Jim!)
%f maps with archive_command and restore_command, so for consistency
this makes sense, at least to me. And I cannot believe that all users
will actually need this argument, per se my use case upthread.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Statement timeout behavior in extended queries
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [Bug fix] PQsendQuery occurs error whentarget_session_attrs is set to read-write