Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRdy1H+FD48Rkz9a_uvUZuOy7b6=h95EZXB6dXLMLYPXA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal  (Josh Berkus <josh@berkus.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>> As someone mentioned, forcing a user to install an extension makes
>> the deprecation visible. Another option would be to have the backend
>> spit out a WARNING the first time you access anything that's
>> deprecated. Both of those are pertinent reminders to people that
>> they need to change their tools.
>
> Ugh.  Please, no.  Hacking up the backend to recognize that a given
> query is referring to a deprecated view and then throwing a warning on
> it is just plain ugly.
>
> Let's go one step further, and throw an ERROR if someone tries to query
> these views instead.

FWIW, I am of the opinion to just nuke them as the "soft of"
deprecation period has been very long. Applications should have
switched to pg_authid and pg_roles long ago already.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] WAL consistency check facility
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal